Statement to be made by Shri Surjit
Singh Barnala, Minister of Chemicals & Fertilizers in Rajya Sabha on17.12.98 in response to the
Calling Attention Notice tabled by Shri
Dipankar Mukherjee and other Members on revival of the sick
units of Hindustan Fertilizer Corporation Ltd.(HFC)
and Fertilizer Corporation of India Ltd.(FCI).
_________________________________________________________________________
The situation
prevailing in the sick fertilizer
undertakings under the administrative
control of the Ministry of Chemicals
& Fertilizers has time and again
engaged the attention of this august
House. I fully share the concern
of the honourable members and feel
that an early decision is required
regarding the fate of these units
of HFC and FCI.
2. The revival
packages formulated in April 1995
for the rehabilitation of HFC and
FCI envisaged the limited revamp
of their functional units. The revamp
of Haldia Project of HFC was not
found to be techno-economically
viable. Similarly, the revamp of
Gorakhpur unit of FCI was not found
feasible as it would have entailed
the setting up of a new ammonia/urea
plant. The requirement of fresh
investment for revamp of the functional
units of HFC and FCI was estimated
at Rs.465 crores and Rs.1736 crores,
respectively. These revival packages
could not be implemented for want
of funding tie-up.
3. An Expert
Group under the leadership of Industrial
Credit & Investment Corporation
of India Ltd.(ICICI) was thereafter
constituted to reformulate the revival
package from the standpoint of funding
by Financial Institutions (FIs).
The Expert Group has put the requirement
of fresh investment for the revamp
of Sindri, Ramagundam and Talcher
units of FCI at Rs.2638 crores and
that for the revamp of Namrup, Durgapur
and Barauni units of HFC at Rs.869
crores. In addition, various other
financial reliefs and concessions
in terms of write off of GOI loans
and accumulated interest aggregating
to Rs.5006 crores are envisaged
to make these packages viable.
4. On the basis
of the Expert Group which submitted
its report in February'97, the Government
considered the revival proposals
and fresh proposals were submitted
in July/August,97 for consideration
of the Government. The Government
decided in October'97 on the revival
package in respect of Namrup units
of HFC. The consideration of the
proposals in respect of the other
units of HFC and FCI was deferred.
5. The revival
proposal in respect of the Namrup
units of HFC involves an estimated
fresh investment of Rs.350 crores
with a term loan component of Rs.156
crore from FIs and Rs.194 crore
as budgetary support. The ground
work for implementation of the revival
package has been expedited. The
company has addressed the problem
of gas supply limitation and has
made necessary arrangements with
OIL/GAIL for augmentation of the
gas supply to the level of 2.17
mmscmd, which would enable the Namrup
Units to attain a satisfactory level
of capacity utilisation. The company
has awarded the Engineering, Procurement
and Construction (EPC) Contract
to Projects Development India Limited
(PDIL) on 2.11.98 on a single point
responsibility basis.
6. On account
of the budgetary constraint and
technology as well as feedstock
related issues which also act as
a serious constraint, it has not
been possible to take a final decision
with regard to the rehabilitation
package for both the HFC & FCI.
7. Revised
comprehensive rehabilitation proposals
in respect of the remaining units
of HFC & FCI have been reformulated
and are presently under inter-ministerial
consultations. As both the companies
stand referred to the BIFR, further
action would have to be taken after
the Government's decision according
to the provisions of the Sick Industrial
Companies (Special Provisions) Act,
1985.
8. It may, however,
be mentioned that the Government
has been providing budgetary support
for meeting essential capital expenditure
and operational requirements of
HFC and FCI.
9. Given the
magnitude of the fresh investment
and other reliefs required, a due
diligence exercise having bearing
on the multiple dimensions of the
issue has been undertaken in the
Government. The Government is committed
to bring about an expeditious and
judicious decision of this complex
issue in the overall national interest.